Money Tracker Forums > Hit celebrations > Is This a Cheat Note

Thread: Is This a Cheat Note

Is This a Cheat Note Posted by trickymario7654 11 years ago (28 Nov 2013)

This 1996 bill $100 i think this is a cheat entry here is the link http://www.moneytracker.com.au/note/82915.html Reply | Reply with quote

Is This a Cheat Note Posted by heihachi73 11 years ago (5 Jan 2014)

I wouldn't be surprised if that note's serial number was nothing more than a bunch of zeroes. Whoever owns this site needs a bit more time to spend on it. The following notes are invalid for tracking and should be blocked and removed from users' banknote lists: RBA specimens on Wikipedia, Money Tracker database ID in brackets: 1988 $10 AA10006761 (99312, apparently no-one had entered this note yet!) 1992 $5 AA87963202 (98313) 2001 $5 DG01942329 (9606) 2002 $5 DM02501529 (9605) 2007 $10 AD07339954 (78639) 2007 $20 IC07385066 (54605) 2003 $50 BF03367306 (7830) 1999 $100 GH99841589 (5745) RBA specimens: http://www.rba.gov.au/Museum/Displays/1988_onwards_polymer_currency_notes/complete_series.html 1995 $5 AA95000000 1993 $10 AA93000000 1994 $20 AA94000000 1995 $50 AA95000000 1996 $100 AJ96617770 (a circulation note?) Most likely the above zero-based serials are not valid, particularly for this $5 note, which was never issued with an AA series beyond the "light" 1992 versions. http://www.rba.gov.au/Museum/Displays/1988_onwards_polymer_currency_notes/centenary_of_federation.html 2001 $5 AA01000001 Fake/improbable notes, database ID in brackets: "2000" $5 ZZ00000001 (74516, AFAIK no Australian banknotes were issued in 2000) "1992" $5 AA12345678 (50555) "2000" $50 AA00000000 (99253, unconfirmed) "1996" $100 AA96000000 (82915, unconfirmed) Reply | Reply with quote